Alaska Congressman Don Young, like all House Republicans, voted against impeaching President Trump today for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Young has called the process a sham. But Democrats prevailed. The case goes next to the Republican-controlled Senate where Trump is likely to triumph.
Alaska Public Media’s Liz Ruskin says no one should expect Alaska’s senators to vote to remove the president from office.
Click arrow to listen to report, continue on to read report.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski sometimes breaks Republican ranks. That seems unlikely on the articles of impeachment. Murkowski said last week the testimonial evidence wasn’t as substantial as expected. Democrats say they might have had more but the White House wouldn’t allow administration officials to testify, and that’s the basis of their obstruction-of-Congress charge. Murkowski isn’t buying that argument.
“In fairness, if you seek that information, there is a way there is a process to gain that, and that is through the subpoenas going to the courts.”
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., says that would take too long, allowing Trump to “cheat” in his 2020 re-election race.
Trump has repeatedly called the impeachment process an attempted coup. But Murkowski says, whether you agree or disagree with the grounds the House case is built on, it’s clear the House is exercising a power granted to it in the Constitution.
“–So I would disagree that they lack the constitutional authority.
–So not a coup?
–I would not use ‘coup’ as a word, no.”
Sen. Dan Sullivan has been against the impeachment process since its early days. In October, he said he didn’t see anything seriously wrong in the phone call at the heart of the case.
“Are there things on a call like this that I would have done? Probably not. But this is the big issue, Liz: are these impeachable offenses, right?”
Democrats charge the president used the power of his office to pressure the leader of Ukraine for investigations to help his re-election campaign. Sullivan said the president was trying to get information about the 2016 election, which he sees as a legitimate inquiry.
Short of their vote on the articles of impeachment, Alaska’s senators may have an opportunity to shape the trial in a more subtle way. Senate Democrats would need at least four Republicans to cross the aisle to summon the current and former White House officials they want to call to testify.
Murkowski hasn’t announced which witnesses she wants to see, but she says if the whistleblower is compelled to answer questions, it should be in a way that protects his or her identity. For Alaska Public Media, I’m Liz Ruskin.